Here we are, almost a year later. And nothing has happened.
| « | July 2009 | » | ||||
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |
I am going to reduce the amount of track. Two mainlines and another complete loop that has access to spurs and sidings is a lot. In addition there will be an elevated loop so that is basically four parallel loops. For a layout with limited space, that seems to be a lot of parallel track that doesn't accomplish much. So I'm going to remove one mainline.
The layout is 1 foot smaller and seems a lot less crowded. I can probably remove an additional 6 inches from both the length and width. I'll think about that for a while.
With more room it will be easier to place interesting accessories like an overhead crane.
I still have not started the layout. I keep changing my mind about how to lay it out. First I decided that I would maek the layout a little larger by using two 4 foot by 6 foot plywood pannels, then I realized that there was no way to access the center of the layout in case a train derailed. So I put four feet of space between the panels by using 2 foot by 4 foot panels. Despite the larger amount of board space, the hole in the middle means that difficult turns like a reversing loop need to sit entirely one on one side of the the center hole. And this layout takes much more space, that would be a large problem. Someone I work with (Alan) suggested that I use a run-around track -- a siding that allows an uncoupled engine to get to the other end of a train to re-attach and pull the opposite direction. I already was planning on having a siding on the layout so I only need to include a siding on the loop of track that is elevated and trains can use the sngle track that will go from the ground level to elevated track.
Without the reverse loop a significant amount of layout space became available and at the same time I no longer need to have enough length and width to have two curves inside the layout. I can use less space and still lay more track. So I shrank the layout to use 3.5 ft by 6 ft end panels and 1.5ft by 3 ft connecting panels.
The blue is the ramp from ground level to the elevated loop. The green is a small part of the elevated track. The browns are ideas fo switches. This is two oval mainlines with additional track. I am trying to make the mainline track more interesting by making it less oval and putting in a crossover using curved switches.
The drawing was made with Atlas RTS software. The layout isn't exact but I'll be using flex track, working from the outside in. I can try to trim a few inches here and there and cut out some space from the larger panels to enlarge the center hole and reduce the length of the 1.5ft wide panels. I might give up the little extra curve in the upper right hand corner to allow trimming 1.5 ft from the layout.

Here's my preliminary layout. Thr purple is at ground level. The blue is the transition from ground to the upward slope. Yellow is the upward slope and red is the transition from top slope to the upper level tracks. Brown is the upper level track. The track that progresses from blue to yellow to red is the strip that will be cut from the base plywood. The blue section will remain attached to the plywood. The red section is where the second level plywood will connect.
There is a row of rerailers on the upper level. This is the most convenient area where trains can be added to the layout.
Newer | Latest | Older